Breaking: Labour government won't implement existing right for workers to request predictable hours

Male hand of planner writing daily appointment On 2020 Calendar book,working space at home.Asian man plan and noted schedule(holiday trip) on the diary at office desk.Calendar for planner concept

The Department for Business and Trade has said that it has ‘no plans’ to introduce the secondary legislation necessary to implement the Worker (Predictable Terms and Conditions) Act 2023.

07.04.2026

The Act gives some workers the right to ask their employer for a more predictable working pattern including the right to work for a certain number of hours, or on particular days of the week. It also applies to workers engaged under fixed term contracts of less than 12 months and provides that employers can only turn down requests if they have a business reason for doing so. 

Although the Act came into force on 18 September 2023, it set out a framework and needed separate regulations to explain exactly how the principles would work. We expected the previous government to do this, but it called the election before that happened. That meant it was down to the new government to decide how to proceed. 

The Labour Party's employment law pledges contained in its Make Work Pay plan included its intention to end ‘one sided flexibility’ between employers and workers. It promised to ensure that ‘all jobs provide a baseline level of security and predictability’ and for workers to ‘have the right to have a contract that reflects the number of hours they regularly work, based on a twelve-week reference period’. 

It could have used the existing Act to easily make some of these changes with a view to strengthening them later on. But it's decided against that approach - it says - because it didn't want to confuse employers and workers by having two different models. The Act will, therefore, be repealed in due course.

The government has said that it intends to implement the Make Work Pay plan in full. The Employment Bill is due to be published soon and we'll need to wait and see if this new right is included. We'll keep you posted. 

Our newsletters

We publish monthly employment newsletters. If you'd like to be added to the mailing list, please let me know. 

Key Contacts

Related Articles

  • Furlough scheme - government updates guidance (again)
    Expert Comment
    Furlough scheme - government updates guidance (again)
    On Thursday 8 April, long after most of us had logged off for the Easter weekend, the government updated its guidance on the Coronavirus: Job Retention Scheme. That means we are now on the third draft.
  • Breaking: Supreme Court will determine how much holiday term-time workers must receive
    Expert Comment
    Breaking: Supreme Court will determine how much holiday term-time workers must receive
    Yesterday we heard that the Supreme Court has given permission for the employers to appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision in Brazel v Harpur Trust.
  • Employer who failed to consider furlough as an alternative to redundancy unfairly dismissed employee
    Expert Comment
    Employer who failed to consider furlough as an alternative to redundancy unfairly dismissed employee
    In Mhindurwa v Lovingangels Care Limited, an Employment Tribunal held that an employee, who was made redundant in the early months of the pandemic, was unfairly dismissed because her employer did not consider furloughing her.