Breaking: Supreme Court will determine how much holiday term-time workers must receive

featured image

Yesterday we heard that the Supreme Court has given permission for the employers to appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision in Brazel v Harpur Trust.

07.04.2026

Last year, the Court of Appeal decided that a teacher engaged on a term time only contract was entitled to 5.6 weeks holiday per year, even though she did not work for the whole year. It said that this was a minimum requirement and it couldn't be pro-rated to reflect the number of weeks she actually worked. Nor, could the employer apply the 12.07% 'formula' for working out her holiday entitlement. You can read our thoughts on the decision here.

Many of our clients were worried they would face a surge in claims and, how they would fund historical underpayments. In some cases that fear has been justified. Unison is very active in this area and has encouraged many workers to pursue claims for unlawful deductions from wages.  

So, it's good news that the Supreme Court will determine this issue. We don't yet know when the hearing will take place and will keep you posted.

Have you received a holiday pay claim?

It's possible, the Supreme Court will reach a different decision, but for now, the Court of Appeal's decision remains the law. If you receive a claim for underpaid holiday for anyone working on a permanent contract for part of the year (such as on a term time basis), we recommend that you take advice as it may be possible to stay the claim pending determination of the issue by the Supreme Court. 

Please contact our holiday pay expert, Glenn Hayes for more advice. 

Key Contacts

Related Articles

  • Furlough scheme - government updates guidance (again)
    Expert Comment
    Furlough scheme - government updates guidance (again)
    On Thursday 8 April, long after most of us had logged off for the Easter weekend, the government updated its guidance on the Coronavirus: Job Retention Scheme. That means we are now on the third draft.
    Read more
  • Employer who failed to consider furlough as an alternative to redundancy unfairly dismissed employee
    Expert Comment
    Employer who failed to consider furlough as an alternative to redundancy unfairly dismissed employee
    In Mhindurwa v Lovingangels Care Limited, an Employment Tribunal held that an employee, who was made redundant in the early months of the pandemic, was unfairly dismissed because her employer did not consider furloughing her.
    Read more
  • No image
    Expert Comment
    Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill: implications for the education sector
    Three months ago the government introduced the Transport Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill to try and reduce the disruption caused by ongoing rail strikes. Since then we've seen waves of strikes across a number of sectors. Nurses, ambulance crew, driving instructors, bus drivers, teachers, and many other workers have gone on strike to try and obtain pay increases and better working conditions. In the context of education, staff at the DfE and Ofsted have also announced they will hold a one-day strike too.
    Read more