Have your say: should the government's Enterprise and Management Incentive scheme be more flexible?

During his March 2020 budget speech, the Chancellor announced that the government intended to review its existing Enterprise and Management Scheme (EMI) to ensure it provides support for high-growth companies to recruit and retain the best talent so they can scale up effectively.

07.04.2026

The EMI scheme is a tax-advantaged share option scheme designed for businesses with company assets of £30 million or less and enables them to reward staff with equity participation.

The government has now published a call for evidence and is asking organisations for their views on whether:

  • the current scheme is fulfilling its policy objectives of helping SMEs recruit and retain employees;
  • companies that are ineligible for the EMI scheme because they have grown beyond the current qualification limits are experiencing structural difficulties (i.e. in the labour market) when recruiting and retaining employees;
  • the government should expand the EMI scheme to support high-growth companies; and
  • other forms of remunerations could provide similar benefits for retention and recruitment as EMI for high-growth companies.

You can read the policy paper here and have until Wednesday 26 May 2021 to respond.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/enterprise-management-incentives-call-for-evidence

Key Contacts

Related Articles

  • Furlough scheme - government updates guidance (again)
    Expert Comment
    Furlough scheme - government updates guidance (again)
    On Thursday 8 April, long after most of us had logged off for the Easter weekend, the government updated its guidance on the Coronavirus: Job Retention Scheme. That means we are now on the third draft.
    Read more
  • Breaking: Supreme Court will determine how much holiday term-time workers must receive
    Expert Comment
    Breaking: Supreme Court will determine how much holiday term-time workers must receive
    Yesterday we heard that the Supreme Court has given permission for the employers to appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision in Brazel v Harpur Trust.
    Read more
  • Employer who failed to consider furlough as an alternative to redundancy unfairly dismissed employee
    Expert Comment
    Employer who failed to consider furlough as an alternative to redundancy unfairly dismissed employee
    In Mhindurwa v Lovingangels Care Limited, an Employment Tribunal held that an employee, who was made redundant in the early months of the pandemic, was unfairly dismissed because her employer did not consider furloughing her.
    Read more