
Coronavirus: Government will refund SSP costs of small employers

The Chancellor announced in today's budget that small employers will be able to recover statutory sick pay costs for up to 14 days for any member of staff who is advised to self isolate or is diagnosed with the coronavirus.
07.04.2026
SSP is payable even if the employee doesn't have any symptoms.
Glenn Hayes, an employment partner here comments:
"Many businesses have been worried about how they’ll cope with meeting the costs of statutory sick pay if many staff members become ill or are advised to self-isolate. Reimbursing small employers for these costs will certainly help but the budget does nothing to assist businesses employing more than 250 staff. If predictions are correct, up to a fifth of the workforce may be affected – that’s a huge cost for businesses, many of whom may also have to engage agency or bank staff to cover staff absence which will also add to their costs. Those businesses that rely on foot fall may already have seen a drop in demand and will be less able to cope with large sick pay costs.
“There was some suggestion that the government might temporarily increase the amount of SSP to encourage more people to stay at home if they have minor symptoms or are asked to self-isolate because, for many, being paid £94.25 per week, is a drop in the ocean compared to their actual lost income. There’s nothing in the budget about this. Some employers are paying staff full pay, but this may not be sustainable in the long run, if significant numbers of people are affected.”
Key Contacts

Related Articles
Expert CommentFurlough scheme - government updates guidance (again)On Thursday 8 April, long after most of us had logged off for the Easter weekend, the government updated its guidance on the Coronavirus: Job Retention Scheme. That means we are now on the third draft.
Expert CommentBreaking: Supreme Court will determine how much holiday term-time workers must receiveYesterday we heard that the Supreme Court has given permission for the employers to appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision in Brazel v Harpur Trust.
Expert CommentEmployer who failed to consider furlough as an alternative to redundancy unfairly dismissed employeeIn Mhindurwa v Lovingangels Care Limited, an Employment Tribunal held that an employee, who was made redundant in the early months of the pandemic, was unfairly dismissed because her employer did not consider furloughing her.