Tom Barnard
Partner
Pay disparity in The Hundred: Male umpires earn over three times more than female umpires
Following the England and Wales Cricket Board’s (ECB) recent decision to increase match fees for England’s women’s players to the current level of men’s match fees for white-ball cricket and Tests, it’s been reported that umpires officiating the men’s Hundred this year received more than three times the amount received by umpires officiating the women’s Hundred.
07.09.2023
The Hundred is a high-profile tournament run by the ECB, established in 2021. It features eight teams from different areas of England and Wales each with a women’s and a men’s squad. The ECB owns the teams and pays the players for the tournament.
In this summer’s edition of the Hundred, umpires of women’s matches received between £300 - £1,000 depending on the stage of the tournament, with the fees for the men’s matches ranging from £1,000 – £2,500. In the rest of the domestic and the international women’s game, umpire’s match fees can be as little as £80 per match, with low levels of pay and short-term retainers drawing criticism. The ECB suggests it is currently working to encourage women into umpiring, but with such a pay gap and a lack of women umpires in the men’s elite game, there are concerns about how this can be achieved. There have also been concerns about the high levels of pay disparity between men’s and women’s players, including in terms of players’ pay for the Hundred. The ECB has called for more external investment in the women’s game, such as from broadcasters and sponsors.
Governing bodies and clubs across sport put themselves at risk where there is significant pay disparity in the game. Where a person is an employee, they must receive equal pay for work of equal value. Even where a person would not be an employee for legal purposes (as may be the case for umpires), there are reputational and cultural risks involved with a lack of proper consideration given to women’s salaries and investment in the women’s game. This means that when reviewing pay and treatment structures, governing bodies and clubs should think not only about players’ salaries but the wider framework, including staff and match officials. In analysing pay structures, governing bodies and clubs should ensure that any unequal pay is properly justified in financial terms (for example, due to different levels of work or differing sponsorship and broadcasting deals) as well as considering both reputational damage caused by pay disparity and its potential impact on the future growth of the sport.
For further information
Our sports sector team recently wrote about equal pay in football. The in-depth article analyses what equal pay disputes can arise, what a claim might look like, and how claims can be avoided.
Umpires were paid three times more to officiate in the men’s Hundred this summer than in the women’s Hundred, the Guardian can reveal. On-field and TV umpires in the women’s Hundred were paid a fee of £300 to officiate in each group‑stage match, while those tasked with officiating in men’s group fixtures were paid £1,000 a game. For the women’s final, umpires received £1,000; yet in the men’s the fee was £2,500. The news comes just days after the England and Wales Cricket Board announced the England women’s team would receive the same match fees in internationals as the England men. However, there is no evidence that any similar move is afoot within umpiring.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/sep/04/umpires-paid-three-times-more-for-mens-hundred-games-than-womens?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Key Contacts
Related Articles
Expert CommentThe power of foreign investment: propelling the UK's sport sector to new heightsOur latest foreign direct investment (FDI) report demonstrates that according to the most recent data available, the UK’s inward FDI position stood at £2,002 billion in 2021, up from £1,919 billion in the previous year.
Expert CommentEqual pay and treatment in football – the legal risks for clubs and governing bodiesRecently, there have been a number of high-profile issues regarding equal pay and equal treatment in football. As the women’s game continues to grow, it is essential for governing bodies and clubs to understand their legal duties in relation to equal pay and equal treatment, and to be aware of the claims that could arise regarding any disparity between their male and female players.
Expert CommentAmbush Marketing and the FIFA Women's World Cup 2023: legal considerations for sponsors and non-sponsorsThe FIFA Women's World Cup has now kicked off and as a sports enthusiast and legal professional, I'm really looking forward to seeing how the teams and the tournament develop over the coming weeks. The excitement surrounding this global event is palpable, and it offers an excellent opportunity for businesses to engage with fans and promote their brands. However, it's crucial for both sponsors and non-sponsors to be aware of the legal issues surrounding ambush marketing to ensure they operate within the boundaries of the law.For those unfamiliar with the term, ambush marketing occurs when a non-sponsor attempts to associate itself with an event or property without the consent of the rights holder. This tactic undermines the investments made by official sponsors and can lead to legal disputes. With the Women's World Cup now underway, it's essential for all businesses to understand the legal landscape and their obligations, whether they're official sponsors or not.For official sponsors, securing exclusive rights is a critical aspect of their investment. They should work closely with their legal advisors to ensure that their sponsorship agreements are robust and contain provisions to protect them from ambush marketing. It's also essential to monitor the market for potential infringements and to take swift action if necessary. In some cases, this may involve sending cease-and-desist letters or initiating legal proceedings against infringing parties. Many endorsement deals will include provisions requiring the rights holder to actively protect the property and the various interests that have been sold. A notable example of ambush marketing occurred during the 2010 FIFA World Cup when a Dutch beer company orchestrated a group of women wearing orange mini-dresses to promote their brand. The stunt led to legal action by FIFA against the company, resulting in a settlement and a public apology from the beer company. Similar stunts are now commonplace at events the world over. The bigger the audience, the bigger the draw for ambush marketers.Non-sponsors must be cautious in their marketing activities to avoid inadvertently engaging in ambush marketing. This includes taking obvious steps such as steering clear of using event logos, trade marks, or other intellectual property without the owner’s permission, as well as more subtle tactics that might create a false association with the event. To ensure compliance, businesses should consult with their legal advisors to review their planned marketing campaigns and identify any potential issues.One legal aspect to consider is the application of national laws, such as the UK's Trade Marks Act 1994, which stipulates the law relating to trade mark use. Additionally, the UK's common law tort of passing off may be relevant in cases where a non-sponsor's marketing efforts falsely imply a connection with the event, causing damage to the official sponsor's goodwill.In addition to intellectual property concerns, both sponsors and non-sponsors should be mindful of advertising regulations, such as the UK Advertising Codes. These rules govern various aspects of advertising, including misleading advertising, substantiation of claims, and comparative advertising. A thorough understanding of these regulations is essential to ensure that marketing efforts remain compliant and don't result in legal disputes or penalties.While the FIFA Women's World Cup presents exciting opportunities for businesses to engage with fans and promote their brands, it's crucial to navigate the legal landscape carefully. By working closely with legal advisors, sponsors and non-sponsors can ensure their marketing activities remain compliant and enjoy the benefits of this global event without risking legal repercussions.